Justin Ehlers

US Trade Officer

What is Project Finance

Project finance funds a single asset or program through a special-purpose vehicle that raises non-recourse or limited-recourse debt. Lenders rely mainly on the project’s contracts and future cash flows, not the sponsor’s balance sheet. This is the standard framing used in World Bank PPP guidance and similar reference texts.

Project finance SPV structure for USA project finance and project funding
How Project Finance Works

Sponsors form an SPV, inject equity, and sign core contracts such as EPC, O&M, interconnection or access, and offtake or availability agreements. Senior lenders commit construction and term debt with drawdowns tied to verified milestones. After completion, the facility converts to amortizing debt serviced by operating cash flows. Security packages cover all project assets, material contracts, accounts, and reserves. When export content is material, export credit agencies can guarantee or directly lend and extend repayment terms. Under the current OECD Arrangement, eligible climate and water-related exports can reach up to 22 years of repayment, which improves bankability for long-life assets.

USA project finance overview showing project funding from construction to operations
Types of loans you will see

Senior secured construction and term loans fund build and operations. Mini-perm loans provide medium-term bank debt that expects a later refinancing in the bond or private placement market. Mezzanine or subordinated debt fills the capital stack between senior debt and equity. Project bonds place long-dated capital with institutional investors when documentation and ratings allow. ECA buyer credits and covered loans use official guarantees or insurance to extend tenor and reduce risk premiums on export-linked scopes. These instruments are standard in US and global practice.

Project funding and project finance diagram for US energy and infrastructure
Market snapshot for 2025

Global liquidity is ample even as domestic underwriting is selective. The Bank for International Settlements reported a record 34.7 trillion dollars of cross-border bank credit at end-March 2025, with lending to non-bank financial institutions up 14 percent year over year

US banks tightened C&I standards and saw weaker loan demand in the second quarter of 2025, according to the Federal Reserve’s July SLOOS. Structured, contract-anchored deals continue to clear committees more reliably than unsecured asks.

Project finance activity is healthy. PFI reports 207.5 billion dollars of global project finance loans in H1 2025, up 32 percent year over year. IJGlobal places global infrastructure finance at 916.89 billion dollars in H1 2025, noting uneven regional trends. Macro trade flows support pipelines. UNCTAD estimates global trade grew by about 300 billion dollars in H1 2025, led by a 14 percent surge in US imports and a 6 percent rise in EU exports.

Energy is a major driver. The IEA projects 3.3 trillion dollars of energy investment in 2025, with around 2.2 trillion dollars going to clean energy, grids, storage, nuclear, efficiency, and electrification.

Why sponsors choose project finance

You ring-fence risk inside an SPV. You size debt to long-term contracts or proven demand. You can reach longer tenors, especially when ECA support applies under the OECD rules. You protect corporate borrowing capacity for other needs while keeping leverage aligned to the asset’s life.

Project finance vs. corporate debt

Corporate debt is faster when the cheque size is modest or the cash flows are volatile. Project finance takes more documentation but can raise larger sums without full recourse. It aligns repayment to the asset and can lower all-in risk if completion, revenue, and operating risks are well allocated. These trade-offs reflect standard practice in World Bank and PPP guidance.

Risks and how to manage them

Construction risk is contained with fixed-price, date-certain EPC contracts, strong warranties, and liquidated damages. Revenue risk is mitigated through bankable offtake or availability agreements. Interest rate and currency risks are hedged to match debt service. Permitting and environmental risks require early studies and conditions precedent. Political risk can be reduced with ECA cover where available. These are mainstream mitigants seen across bank and ECA processes.

Pricing, tenor, and covenants in plain English

Pricing reflects country, counterparty, and completion risk. Tenor follows asset life and contract visibility. The modernized OECD Arrangement permits up to 22 years for eligible climate and water projects, which can reduce annual debt service for grid, water, generation, storage, and related assets. Covenants typically include minimum DSCR, reserve accounts, completion tests, distribution locks, and cure rights that protect lenders until the asset proves itself.

2025 trends to watch

Refinancing is back as completed assets tap longer money in the bond and private placement markets. Private credit participates more often alongside banks in mini-perm and holdco structures. Data centers, clean energy, LNG, and grid upgrades attract capital as demand and policy align. Trade flows and the energy mix point to strong US pipelines, but bank credit remains selective, which makes documentary quality and risk allocation decisive. The BIS, Fed, UNCTAD, and IEA reads above describe this backdrop.

Getting started with Mountaintop Capital Partners LLC

Bring your scope, site, counterparties, and timeline. We will help shape the SPV, contract set, and capital stack. We arrange senior debt, ECA-backed solutions, receivables structures where relevant, and private placements for scale.